about the CLA request
Patrice Dumas
pertusus at free.fr
Fri Aug 26 09:33:35 UTC 2005
Hi,
I have some comments/questions about the CLA phase (I am not a lawyer, so
please forgive me if i don't use the right words...):
1) about the private informations requested:
* Is the telephone really needed?
* Is the address really needed?
* If the response is yes to questions above I think there should be a note
about who has access to these datas, how it is possible to change them
and how exactly they will be used, internally in the fedora project (and
externally?).
* I also think that the juridiction that the Fedora project follows
regarding those kind of private informations should be mentionned. It
seems to be different than what is in my country (France), so for
the ones that are not accustomed to that juridiction maybe a link or
a brief explanation could be added?
2) about the CLA:
There are contradictory statements in the mail saying that the CLA should
be electronically signed and in the CLA itself saying that an ink signature
is required (and at that point some possibilities are mentionned). I
personnaly think that the gpg signature is enough (and if I'm not wrong
it is being recognized in judgements).
--
Pat
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list