Please Follow Procedure, Use CVS comments

[Michael Schwendt]

On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:29:02 -1000, Warren Togami wrote:

> gemi and Everyone,
> 
> Why was unison and yap requested for build?  There has been no request 
> on fedora-extras-list for package review, and no APPROVED message on 
> fedora-extras-commits showing that somebody reviewed it.
> 
> (I'm currently using prolog in one of my classes, so I'm interested in 
> your pl package.  I am reviewing that one now.)
> 
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-February/msg00208.html
> Please follow the Interim New Package Process.
> 
> This is also a reminder to everyone, please use CVS commit comments when 
> you commit any change.

I'd also like to point out that a quick succession of "commit, request
build in wiki, built and published" makes extras-commits list useless.
Once built and published, any comments would be too late. Before
requesting a build, better give your package changes another look and
test-build them in a clean environment, too. It's not like version
upgrades and major package changes require urgent builds. Waiting a day
and giving list observers the chance to comment on changes would be better
in the beginning.