Please Follow Procedure, Use CVS comments
Thorsten Leemhuis
fedora at leemhuis.info
Sat Feb 12 16:57:40 UTC 2005
Am Samstag, den 12.02.2005, 17:14 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:29:02 -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
>
> > gemi and Everyone,
> >
> > Why was unison and yap requested for build? There has been no request
> > on fedora-extras-list for package review, and no APPROVED message on
> > fedora-extras-commits showing that somebody reviewed it.
> >
> > (I'm currently using prolog in one of my classes, so I'm interested in
> > your pl package. I am reviewing that one now.)
> >
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-February/msg00208.html
> > Please follow the Interim New Package Process.
> >
> > This is also a reminder to everyone, please use CVS commit comments when
> > you commit any change.
>
> I'd also like to point out that a quick succession of "commit, request
> build in wiki, built and published" makes extras-commits list useless.
> Once built and published, any comments would be too late. Before
> requesting a build, better give your package changes another look and
> test-build them in a clean environment, too. It's not like version
> upgrades and major package changes require urgent builds. Waiting a day
> and giving list observers the chance to comment on changes would be better
> in the beginning.
Okay, shame on me, I did this also.
But to make this whole situation a bit easier: Is there any reason why
the Interim New Package Process is not yet in the wiki (or did I
overlook it?)? If no one has objections I'm going to import it in the
next days.
--
Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info>
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list