bug #149713

[David Woodhouse]

On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 17:40 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> I don't think we can expect an extras packager to fix upstream bugs in the 
> code, packagers deal with *packaging* bugs. If the packager *can* fix bugs 
> (and certainly many can, to some extent at least) then fine, but me thinks 
> things like this can safely be closed with "please report upstream 
> instead" unless the bug is caused by FE-specific changes to the software.

In the case of _real_ bugs, I disagree. Part of the job of packaging is
to make sure bugs get fixed and fed upstream. It's not just grunt-work.

-- 
dwmw2