bug #149713
Ralf Corsepius
rc040203 at freenet.de
Mon Feb 28 16:44:05 UTC 2005
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 16:04 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 17:40 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > I don't think we can expect an extras packager to fix upstream bugs in the
> > code, packagers deal with *packaging* bugs. If the packager *can* fix bugs
> > (and certainly many can, to some extent at least) then fine, but me thinks
> > things like this can safely be closed with "please report upstream
> > instead" unless the bug is caused by FE-specific changes to the software.
>
> In the case of _real_ bugs, I disagree. Part of the job of packaging is
> to make sure bugs get fixed and fed upstream. It's not just grunt-work.
ACK. In this case (if the reporter's description is correct - I did not
check the code.) it is a _real_ bug.
Ralf
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list