wtogami at redhat.com
Sat Mar 5 10:43:54 UTC 2005
Matthias Saou wrote:
> I'm going to be bugging again :-)
> I think as many as possible "Obsoletes" should have an explicit version.
> This case is a perfect exemple : If some day, for some reason, the company
> who first started tuxracer (or another ones who got the rights to the name
> and such) continues the game, even maybe basing it on a current ppracer,
> then we may pretty much see a newer tuxracer obsolete ppracer! We'd then
> have a typical dependency loop that could have been avoided by just having
> put a version for the obsoletes *now*.
> So for me, trying to look in the future as much as possible, what should be
> done here is :
> Obsoletes: tuxracer <= 0.61
Agreed. Sorry I didn't mention this earlier.
More information about the fedora-extras-list