New package : ncftp

Tom 'spot' Callaway tcallawa at
Sun Mar 6 14:13:56 UTC 2005

On Sun, 2005-03-06 at 12:31 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>Le dimanche 06 mars 2005 à 04:38 -0500, Zing a écrit :
>> On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 23:55:01 +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:
>> > As ncftp has been removed from FC, I've imported it into Extra's devel
>> > branch. I've already committed a first set of changes, so reviews and
>> > feedback are welcome.
>> Shouldn't $RPM_BUILD_ROOT be used rather than %{buildroot}?
>The rule was I think you can use the one you want provided it's the only
>one you use in your spec (ie no mixing). %{buildroot} is certainly more
>pleasing to the eye than $RPM_BUILD_ROOT (runs;)

Actually, the rule is "use the item that Jeff Johnson says to". In this
case, its $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.

Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Sales Engineer || GPG Fingerprint: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader:
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!

More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list