New package : ncftp

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le dimanche 06 mars 2005 à 08:13 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway a écrit :
> On Sun, 2005-03-06 at 12:31 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> >Le dimanche 06 mars 2005 à 04:38 -0500, Zing a écrit :
> >> On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 23:55:01 +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:
> >> 
> >> > As ncftp has been removed from FC, I've imported it into Extra's devel
> >> > branch. I've already committed a first set of changes, so reviews and
> >> > feedback are welcome.
> >> 
> >> Shouldn't $RPM_BUILD_ROOT be used rather than %{buildroot}?
> >
> >The rule was I think you can use the one you want provided it's the only
> >one you use in your spec (ie no mixing). %{buildroot} is certainly more
> >pleasing to the eye than $RPM_BUILD_ROOT (runs;)
> 
> Actually, the rule is "use the item that Jeff Johnson says to". In this
> case, its $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.

Well, I'm pretty sure I'm only relaying his clarification on this list
(won't hunt it in the archives though). As long as you don't mix stuff,
it's ok to use whatever you prefer.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050306/4164c108/attachment.sig>