potential candidates for contribution
che666 at uni.de
Thu Mar 17 10:15:36 UTC 2005
Am Donnerstag, den 17.03.2005, 10:33 +0100 schrieb Iago Rubio:
> On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 09:33 +0100, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 17.03.2005, 02:04 -0500 schrieb Ignacio Vazquez-
> > Abrams:
> > > On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 23:01 +0100, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> > > > 1. trigger - 3d rallye game.
> > >
> > > physfs not available from Core or Extras.
> > available in newrpms see link above
> You should then advocate for the addition of dependencies and then to
> the addition of the programs itself.
> > > Doesn't use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%buildroot consistently.
> > is that really an issue?
> It's in the Packaging Guidelines, so yes it's an issue.
ya i just asked that question for the trivial reason that doesnt make a
difference at all besides some aestetic value ;).
id see more sense if one of the styles would be preferred else its a mix
up again repo wide.
> > > > 3. flightgear - 3d flight simulator
> > >
> > > simgear not available from Core or Extras.
> > available from newrpms see above
> I really don't think the availability of a dependency on newrpms have
> anything to do with Fedora Extras.
> As I said, I think it will be much better to add first those
> dependencies to Extras, as without them the packages you mentioned are
> useless and should not be added.
librarys without applications are as useless as applications without
librarys. So i thought if youd add a library you need a reason for
adding the library? or am i wrong?
If you read the initial mail the dependencys are part of the whole deal.
maybe i should list em too... thought that was trivial.
More information about the fedora-extras-list