Missing packagers

Nicolas Mailhot Nicolas.Mailhot at laPoste.net
Thu Mar 24 18:19:09 UTC 2005

Le jeudi 24 mars 2005 à 16:54 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
> On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 20:18 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > BTW I for one never bothered replying yet, because my packages are just
> > old stuff that is pretty static now (only needed to interpret old
> > archive formats).
> > 
> > I can do it now if there's a special hurry, though I doubt archivers
> > that have not changed for several years will need an active packager
> > anytime soon:)
> The perl-Convert-UUlib upstream changelog since the latest fedora.us/FE
> package update has keywords like "likely exploitable segfault", so you
> may want to take a look at least at that.
> http://search.cpan.org/src/MLEHMANN/Convert-UUlib-1.051/Changes

Damn - ok I'll go through the whole procedure then.

Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050324/8d4e1230/attachment.sig>

More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list