[Bug 173052] Review Request: ttywatch

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ttywatch


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173052





------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de  2005-11-24 05:15 EST -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> (for comment #6):
> 
> > Shipping a header without a corresponding library is non-sense.
> 
> There is no any library at all. The header file is shipped just for building
> additional plugins for the main executable.
Headers describe APIs to something. Therefore, shipping a header without the
corresponding implementation therefore is nonsense.

> BTW this header file is 2392-bytes only, shipping an extra "devel" package for
> such amount of bytes is an ugly way.
Shipping such a file is simply pollution.

> (There are precedents in FE for 
> omitting of > separate devel package in such situations).
Your package is missing the implementation of the devel package.

I don't want to fret about this, but unless you can provide an example or
describe how this header file is supposed to be used, I consider to veto against
this package. - I definitely won't approve it.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.