[Bug 173052] Review Request: ttywatch

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ttywatch


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173052





------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name  2005-11-24 05:48 EST -------
> Headers describe APIs to something.
Sure. "something" is /usr/sbin/ttywatch itself.

ttywatch is linked properly with -ldl, i.e. can dlopen(3) plugins at runtime. To
write a plugin, a user should follow some io-data layouts/bits, which are
specified in /usr/include/ttywatch.h .

As there are no any referenses in /usr/sbin/ttywatch usable for extern plugins,
"-rdynamic" option at link time is not needed.

> I don't want to fret about this, but unless you can provide an example or
> describe how this header file is supposed to be used
Matt, could you write some example? BTW, it can be useful to include into %doc 

> I consider to veto against this package
Could you gpg-sign a text with veto report and reasons for such veto? ;)


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.