2 questions about easytag

Callum Lerwick seg at haxxed.com
Tue Apr 11 20:42:36 UTC 2006

On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 21:50 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> 2. Is it possible to see easytag unstable (1.99.12 ATM) in extras? I'm
> using this package a lot so I rolled my own rpm and it's pretty stable
> (IMO at least as stable as the 1.1 release). With yesterdays update the
> annoying cddb bug is fixed, so I don't see no blocker there. Easytag 1.1
> depends on gtk+. C'mon - let's get rid of this old crap ASAP, at least
> in development!

Easytag kicks ass. It sure would be nice to have a GTK2 version. Looks
like its maintained by Matthias, and 1.99.12 is already available in
freshrpms. You could probably poke him to see about moving to 1.99.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060411/6b4e461d/attachment.sig>

More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list