Unorphan: arc

Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at
Sun Apr 30 20:18:14 UTC 2006

Le dimanche 30 avril 2006 à 18:09 +0200, Hans de Goede a écrit :
> Nicolas Mailhot wrote:

> > When I had to choose between nomarch and arc for orphaning, no one stood
> > for arc (nor, for that matter nomarch). So I decided to keep the most
> > recent codebase in the tree.
> > 
> Yes its in decent shape, although it does throw 2 warnings about using 
> the unscure mktemp function. I think I'll patch those 2 and taken 
> ownership of arc. Choice is always good and it doesn't seem a lott of 
> work. If it does turn out to be more effort then its worth it it csn be 
> orphaned again (not that I'm planning on that).

arc still got an upstream which is responsive - you can forward patches
to them, they'll release new versions.

<evil:plan>since arc is taken care of, may I drop nomarch?</evil:plan>

Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <>

More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list