Unorphan: arc

Hans de Goede j.w.r.degoede at
Sun Apr 30 20:33:47 UTC 2006

Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le dimanche 30 avril 2006 à 18:09 +0200, Hans de Goede a écrit :
>> Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>>> When I had to choose between nomarch and arc for orphaning, no one stood
>>> for arc (nor, for that matter nomarch). So I decided to keep the most
>>> recent codebase in the tree.
>> Yes its in decent shape, although it does throw 2 warnings about using 
>> the unscure mktemp function. I think I'll patch those 2 and taken 
>> ownership of arc. Choice is always good and it doesn't seem a lott of 
>> work. If it does turn out to be more effort then its worth it it csn be 
>> orphaned again (not that I'm planning on that).
> arc still got an upstream which is responsive - you can forward patches
> to them, they'll release new versions.
> <evil:plan>since arc is taken care of, may I drop nomarch?</evil:plan>
Erm, the idea was to lower the count of orphans, but you're a free man
and its a free world.



More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list