[Bug 167974] Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Apr 18 09:25:28 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167974


bugzilla at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|fedora-extras-              |
                   |list at redhat.com             |
                 CC|                            |fedora-package-
                   |                            |review at redhat.com
                 CC|fedora-package-             |
                   |review at redhat.com           |
                 CC|                            |fedora-extras-
                   |                            |list at redhat.com




------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com  2006-04-18 05:25 EST -------
Apologies for "sitting" on this for too long.

0) <http://cvs.haskell.org/Hugs/downloads/2005-03/>
Upstream are now using YYYY-MM to label download dirs at least,
so I wonder if it is better to use 2005.03 say for the version.
(eg Gentoo is using 2005.3)

1) rpmlint complains:

W: hugs98 invalid-license BSDish, see License file, GPL, LGPL

I think just calling it BSD would be sufficient.

2) There seems to a small build problem on fc5:
:
Compiling FFI stubs
../../../src/ffihugs -98 -P../../../hugsdir/packages/OpenAL: -i"HsOpenAL.h"
../../../hugsdir/packages/OpenAL/Sound/OpenAL/AL/Buffer.hs -Iinclude
-DCALLCONV=ccall -lopenal
runhugs: Error occurred
ERROR "../../../hugsdir/packages/OpenAL/Sound/OpenAL/AL/BasicTypes.hs":70 -
Undefined type constructor "HTYPE_ALCLAMPD"

Skipping OpenAL package
:

but probably openal support is not that important and
could be skipped for now on fc5.

3) Probably the description should be made more concise.

4) md5sum is good

5) buildrequires need to be updated for modular X: I attach a diff below.

6) builds fine with mock on fc4 and fc5 x86_64

7) Perhaps it is a good idea to configure --with-pthreads?

8) if demos/ (2.3MB) is to be included, it must be subpackaged into
a separate subpackage (say hugs98-demos).

Otherwise looks good to me.  I think if at least 0, 1, 5, and 8 are addressed
this package can be accepted.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list