package EOL

[Patrice Dumas]

> If the repository is not to be aggressively pruned (at least in devel,
> keeping stuff in existing releases is something else) I'd really love if
> all the convenient-but-really-dangerous-to-use-long-term stuff was moved

What is your definition for a 
convenient-but-really-dangerous-to-use-long-term package? I don't see
any other than 'no packager is willing to maintain it'. But it seems
that you have another definition...

I agree that orphaned packages without dependencies should be removed 
from devel, however.

--
Pat