[Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922





------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com  2006-01-26 10:00 EST -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > 
> > actually to have bri cards working there are 3 ways.
> > 
> > misdn bristuff and visdn.
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > hope that helps while its not directly relevant for the package itsself in 
my 
> > eyes that infos are still relevant for getting a production ready asterisk.
> > 
> > bri cards are rather widespread because they are relatively cheap 
> > (junghanns/beronet quad and octo cards e.g.)
> My Asterisk package does not at this time include support for plain 'ol Zaptel
> cards.  I know that this leaves Europeans in a bit of a lurch because of all 
of
> the BRI hardware over there.  I'll look into the various BRI options once the
> base Asterisk package is approved and see if I can't get something into FE.

Yup thats pretty fine to me i just wanted to point out the problem in general.

visdn seems to be the cleanest solution though. only backdraw yet is missing 
echo suppression since its young.


> (In reply to comment #6)
> > just curious... why do you "noreplace" all configs? dont we want to have 
the 
> > unmodified default configs replaced?
> Users may or may not be depending on the configuration that is in 
the "default"
> configuration files.  If the default configuration files change it would be
> better for the administrator to manually take a look at all of the .rpmnew 
files
> and decide if any changes are going to break his/her setup.

well but how about the other case?

lets assume we go ahead various versions of asterisk... and how high do you 
eval the chance the the old config will be broken in newer releases? in my eyes 
if they werent changed by the user they should really be replaced by the new 
versions default configs. i am not sure if theres a policy regarding that or 
not.
just an opinion.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.