scientific license - fedora compatible?

[Konstantin Ryabitsev]

On 5/23/06, Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood at gmail.com> wrote:
> It would be nice. The unmentionable repo does not operate in the same
> way as FE, as far as I can tell - it would be really nice to have a
> repo for non-commercial stuff not allowed in extras, let's called it
> Luvna, which uses the same infrastructure as FE, and which is open to
> contributors.

Shouldn't we call them "freeluvna" and "non-freeluvna" then? :)

-- 
Konstantin Ryabitsev
Montréal, Québec