Maintainer sought for lirc-kmod(-common)

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Sun May 28 17:16:27 UTC 2006


On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 08:03:35PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> I've sat on lirc-kmod(-common) for too long, sorry about that, but I've
> just officially orphaned them.
> 
> More info: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/192621#c1
> 
> The thing is that I'm fine with continuing to maintain the main lirc
> package, but I have no use or hardware for the kernel modules.  And the
> main lirc packages works for many without the modules, so a dependency
> should not be added.  But one the lirc kmods are shipped, we'll need to
> keep them in sync with the main lirc package.  I don't personally think
> that's problematic and thus having a separate maintainer for the modules
> should work ok.  If there is disagreement and volunteers available to
> take care of the whole shebang, I can let go of the main lirc package as
> well though.

I think the two are too much tied to be independently maintained.

> Any takers?

I gladly would, but I need to convince the peers here about kmdl
adoption first :)
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060528/dc5971ad/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list