New accounts LDAP server running

[Mike McGrath]

On 1/7/07, Elliot Lee <sopwith at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 4, 2007, at 10:03 PM, TomLy wrote:
> Just noticed that the project_group.prerequisite_id field is not
> carried over to the new schema, and the page didn't sound like there
> was a general understanding of why the field is there.
>
> It's there to allow you to specify that anyone who joins a group must
> be in another group first. Most of the time it is used to enforce CLA
> compliance for a particular group, by setting cla_done as a
> prerequisite for any groups that give access that needs the CLA (e.g.
> all the cvs* groups).
>
> AFAIK, enforcing CLA compliance is a must for the future, and if
> we're going to implement a solution for that, it might as well be
> generic (instead of just a 'needs_cla' field in the DB, for example).
>

This is true, it would be nice to enforce this at the LDAP level
somewhere.  Lyz do you know of any way to do this?  We may want to
talk to the FDS people.

               -Mike