Moin 1.6 and 1.7
paulo.banon at googlemail.com
Wed Jun 6 17:12:47 UTC 2007
Personally i would go for 1.7, since im sure that noone will want to
maintain their own moin branch, and keep patching it manually without
breaking the rest of the "new" patches.
On 6/6/07, Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote:
> Last summer we were tracking GSoC changes against the 1.5 trunk of Moin.
> Those change never got merged, so did not make the 1.6 release. FWIW,
> we're still looking for someone interested in Python, DocBook, and Moin
> to help maintain those patches; if we did, we might get them accepted
> into the trunk.
> A current SoC project is working on providing a Wiki interface for
> editing man/info pages. More details are found on Ville-Pekka's project
> The question has come up from Ville-Pekka if we want to track our
> changes against the current Moin version (1.6) or the upcoming (1.7),
> and we need to have a decision within the week.
> Any thoughts on this?
> From the project page:
> "* Finally decide on 1.6 vs. 1.7. This needs to happen this week as of
> writing (week 23). No major changes will get to 1.6 anymore, so if I
> based my project on it, then Fedora would need to run an unmerged branch
> of the code. Probably not what we want? My suggestion is to work on 1.7
> branch and hopefully get my changes merged into mainline eventually."
>  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SummerOfCode/2007/VillePekkaVainio
> Karsten Wade, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project
> Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
> quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41
> ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
> Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
> Fedora-infrastructure-list at redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Fedora-infrastructure-list