RFR: GIT Package VCS

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Wed Jun 6 18:34:32 UTC 2007

On Wednesday 06 June 2007 14:29:41 Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Moreover,there have been requests from developers to explicitly *NOT*
> significantly change the development methodology for F8 after the changes
> of F7.

I firmly believe that this is not something we can do by F8 release.  This is 
something we need to discuss and strawman and put up proof of concepts and 
get more people thinking on it during the F8 cycle and try to implement 
during the F9 cycle if possible.

From an inwardly looking perspective, this still fits well as RHEL5 just 
shipped and it will be a bit before RHEL6 really starts hitting heavy, so 
making a change to internal infrastructure to mirror whats going on in Fedora 
during the F9 cycle is still good timing.

Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/attachments/20070606/b396e547/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list