Web Server Bug

Toshio Kuratomi a.badger at gmail.com
Mon Jun 18 01:31:34 UTC 2007

On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 20:36 -0500, David Douthitt wrote:
> Mike McGrath wrote:
> > Yes, the code dump is ugly but the accounts system is being completely
> > re-written so all work to fix the current system has basically been
> > put on hold, though the complaint you have is a common one. 
> That's good to know - yet, this makes me think of two things.
> One, why not put that into a FAQ somewhere that people can look at?
> Another thing that comes to mind - I don't know if this is already done,
> or if the discussion on it has already been thrashed to death - but why
> not use Subversion and two different branches, one being a development
> branch and one a stable branch?  Innumerable projects do this already,
> including FreeBSD, Linux, Samba, and who knows how many more.....
Two different branches of what?  The website?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/attachments/20070617/b51b1f05/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list