Paulo Santos paulo.banon at googlemail.com
Mon Jun 18 19:04:08 UTC 2007

+1 on the cleanup

Regarding, changing the actually SCM, do we need anything that CVS doesnt
offer ?
If we do, then lets discuss options, if we dont, then let's stick with it.


On 6/18/07, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath at redhat.com> wrote:
> So there's a great deal of discussion about the Fedora Packaging SCM its
> time we look at the Infrastructure SCM.  We now host cvs, hg, git and
> svn.  For our configuration management we're using for our development.
> For many items we've actually created hosted sites (smolt, mirror
> manager) seems appropriate for these project which, in theory, are
> useful to others.  But what about some of our other development where a
> hosted project would be wasted?  This would be like, kindofblue (our
> wiki theme) or a plone plugin.  We're using cvs for this right now in
> the fedora repo.  I think we should do some clean up on this repo but
> while we're doing its good to evaluate whether or not to move to
> something else or to continue using it.
> Thoughts?
>     -Mike
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
> Fedora-infrastructure-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/attachments/20070618/de4d9505/attachment.htm>

More information about the Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list