fedora-l] Re: Novell/progeny to take up redhat legacy services
Warren Togami
warren at togami.com
Thu Dec 4 21:58:08 UTC 2003
Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> I was wondering if we could focus on methods and action more than other
> peoples press releases and counting angels on the head of a pin...
>
> In 27 days, action is going to be needed, and we dont even have a press
> release, or MORE important some build machines, a build process, a QA
> process, a push process, and mirroring process.
>
Build server: What is the status Jesse?
For expediency, may I suggest the existing fedora.us QA queue and method
for package submission & approval. Only difference would be the package
naming which we still have to discuss.
fedora.us can do builds easily if Pogo Linux donated dedicated server is
not ready by that time.
> We could start testing the waters by building rsync RPMS, testing them,
> signing them, and getting them out the door on at least one mirror.
>
Good idea. Please submit to fedora.us.
Warren
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list