[Fedora-legacy-list] Re: Delay? Looks bad for Fedora

[Jesse Keating]

On Thursday 06 November 2003 22:51, Martin Kunz wrote:
> Just out of curiosity.. what would be the requirements, bandwidth and
> storage wise, to act reasonably as a mirror?
>
> Me and some of my clients will have a much easier life and sleep a
> lot better for every additional month that the community can keep the
> older releases alive, so we'd like to help out if we can!

Not much initially.  Probably outbound speeds of a T1 or better, capable 
of handling or throttling so that the usage doesn't swamp your normal 
services.  Storage in the 5gigs area (very soft number, It may take us 
QUITE a while to hit 5gigs of updates).

Perhaps some people who run mirrors for Red Hat currently can speak to 
the usage they see for just updates.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraLegacy)
Mondo DevTeam           (www.mondorescue.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
 
Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20031107/c841fbf0/attachment.sig>