Legacy going to move...?

Jesse Keating jkeating at j2solutions.net
Tue Apr 6 00:30:15 UTC 2004


On Monday 05 April 2004 17:32, Colin Charles wrote:
> Would you like to provide a tiny write-up for the Fedora News Updates
> next? Maybe you can use it as a focal point for a call for
> volunteers?

If I had an ounce of free time I might, but things are a bit busy this 
next week or so.  Especially w/ the move of download.fedoralegacy.org.  
I'd do a Q/A session, or approve a writeup by one of the other 
community members, but I haven't the capacity right now to do a writeup 
myself ):

> > > Sorry if this has been answered elsewhere
> >
> > It hasn't exactly been clear.
>
> Yes, I was under the impression that: While Core 1 is being supported
> by RH, the Legacy project keeps 7.x, 8, and 9 in support. When Core 2
> is out, we moved to 8,9,Core 1. Core 3 brings us 9, Core 1, Core 2.
> And so on...
>
> This might need to become clearer (or am I the only one getting such
> an impression?)

It can be somewhat confusing, Rolling supported releases are in effect 
for Fedora Core releases, not RHL releases.  How would you suggest we 
word it on our website?

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
 
Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20040405/a0a0cc20/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-legacy-list mailing list