fedora-legacy-list Digest, Vol 6, Issue 25
David Botsch
dwb7 at ccmr.cornell.edu
Tue Aug 31 17:02:11 UTC 2004
My mistake. QA the ones in 1289, then, if not already done.
On 2004.08.31 12:15 John Dalbec wrote:
>> I've also taken a look through bugzilla and see that the following
>> need QA for RH 7.3 (ie gpg signed sha1sum'ed QA reports):
>>
>> 1726: krb5
>> 1831: XFree86
>
> Bug 1831 does not apply to RH 7.3. Or does the fact that I posted
> packages with a higher version number mean we have to QA those
> instead of the packages from bug 1289?
> My application of the patch in bug 1831 shouldn't cause problems with
> XFree86 in RH 7.3; it just adds a redundant sanity check.
> Should I build new packages without the patch? Which bug should I
> post them in?
> John
>
>
> --
> fedora-legacy-list mailing list
> fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
--
********************************
David William Botsch
Consultant/Advisor II
CCMR Computing Facility
dwb7 at ccmr.cornell.edu
********************************
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list