mpg321 decision needed
m.stolte at datadevil.demon.nl
m.stolte at datadevil.demon.nl
Fri Jan 9 11:06:18 UTC 2004
Quoting Matthias Saou
<thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net>:
> Warren Togami wrote :
>
> I'm actually _using_ mpg321 in production on some RH7.3 servers, as it is
> required to play sound files for some of our IVR developments based on
> asterisk. So crippling an update _would_ bother me.
>
> I think the package should be updated, or just left as-is if the
> vulnerability is minor, but not "crippled" in any way.
agreed, I dont anymore, but I used to maintain a similair setup for a
broadcasting company.
Maarten Stolte
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list