Proposal: Optional libsafe add-on?
Christian Pearce
pearcec at commnav.com
Wed Jan 21 15:18:26 UTC 2004
I never used it but seems like a good idea. Especially if we are slowed in releases of a fixed. It might add some extra protection while we wait for a release. If libsafe in FC?
--
Christian Pearce
http://www.commnav.com
Warren Togami said:
>
> seth vidal wrote:
> >>>
> >>>Modifying the world as an 'option' for legacy updates seems like a bad
> >>>idea, a confusing idea for users, and generally a waste of time. If I've
> >>>got older machines I want them to be left alone and just have security
> >>>patches applied. I don't want to be putting brand new things on there.
> >>>
> >>>-sv
> >>>
> >>
> >>This is why I suggested putting it on the webpage with lots of
> >>documentation and manual installation only. The documentation would to
> >>people NOT to use it unless they really know what they are doing and
> >>willing to monitor their server for a while.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Why waste all the time building the packages and writing up the
> > documentation?
> >
> > People should be working on new things for FC2 and not screwing around
> > with old distributions.
> >
> > -sv
>
> Shrug. Most of the work is already done, and it has worked great for me
> on these old distributions for years. I'm willing to do it. I am just
> wondering if folks here think it is a proper thing to offer on the
> Legacy web page or not.
>
> Warren
>
>
> --
> fedora-legacy-list mailing list
> fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
>
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list