Laundry list...

[Jesse Keating]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 28 January 2004 08:06, Pekka Savola wrote:
> Btw, are all the dist versions tied together when moving from testing
> to updates?  I.e., can a test update be "released" before all the
> arches have been tested?

They are tied together.  They need to move as one, so that only one 
announcement has to be sent, and thus avoiding confusion.

> That is, because there seems to a bit of lack of support for moving
> these along, could this be fast-tracked by focusing the effort on
> RHL73 and doing the rest when appropriate? (Or am I looking at a wrong
> problem..?)

This is a real problem, and one I envisioned from the start.  When I 
started this project, I only wanted to support RHL 7.3 and 9, but due to 
community influence, I've included support for 7.2 and 8.0 as well.  I'm 
going to implement a policy that if a package receives good feedback on 
7.3, and no other feedback with in 3 days, that the entire package group 
will be pushed to updates.  Does anybody have a problem with this policy?

- -- 
Jesse Keating RHCE	(http://geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team	(http://www.fedoralegacy.org)
Mondo DevTeam		(www.mondorescue.org)
GPG Public Key		(http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)

Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAF+Gc4v2HLvE71NURAuRqAJ4+zsomhrQiCUmyE45vp59fP4sE9ACgxx6S
9eeXv1UvfiFwIWqeljOPxUc=
=PowT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----