fedora-legacy-list Digest, Vol 3, Issue 24
Howard Owen
hbo at egbok.com
Thu May 20 23:14:23 UTC 2004
There's no doubt that this was deliberate on the part of Red Hat. But not
everyone is jumping ship. The last I looked, Red Hat's subscriptions are
way up, and their renewal rate is between 80%-90%.
Also, while the instability and disavowal of support do scare off
business use of Fedora Core, the willingness to accept the latest changes
in existing packages, and to try new stuff is appealing to the geeks among
us. This is a core (heh) constituency that Red Hat needs to keep on board
to ensure their enterprise offering stays at a high level of quality and
relevance. This also seems to be working.
On Thu, 20 May 2004, Kelson Vibber wrote:
> At 03:23 PM 5/20/2004, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
> >Unstable release?
> >
> >I know a _bunch_ of people running FC1 on servers depending on FL to get
> >patches out when RH stops.
>
> Blame Red Hat marketing. I think they're deathly afraid people will keep
> using Fedora Core the same way they were using the free RHL. Hence, the
> warnings about FC stability, in hopes that people will move to RHEL
> instead. Of course, what's happened instead is a mass (or at least noisy)
> exodus to SuSE and Debian, with a lot of people moving to Fedora Core
> anyway and others moving to RHEL clones like cAos, Whitebox, etc.
>
> "It will eat your braaane!"
>
>
> Kelson Vibber
> SpeedGate Communications <www.speed.net>
>
>
>
> --
> fedora-legacy-list mailing list
> fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
>
>
--
Howard Owen "Even if you are on the right
EGBOK Consultants track, you'll get run over if you
hbo at egbok.com +1-650-218-2216 just sit there." - Will Rogers
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list