yum broken :p (quick replies)
Barbara Pennacchi
b.pennacchi at istc.cnr.it
Wed Sep 15 18:32:39 UTC 2004
Hi, a quick round of replies:
---- "S.Joseph" <joseph at ndimedia.com> wrote:
> I use Apt on my RH9 , I'll try out Yum and let you know how my
> experience
Aside from the fact that leaving the whole full quoted text below your
reply doesn't look so nice in the eyes of some people, maybe I haven't
made myself clear: until I updated python manually and only by a small
notch, yum worked fine. I don't use apt so I cannot provide you with a
comparison list.
---- Jeff Sheltren <sheltren at cs.ucsb.edu> wrote:
> https://lists.linux.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum
I dunno why, but this url makes firefox hang till I do a kill -9. :-) with
elinks works, though.
Been perusing in their bugzilla, though.
---- Eric Rostetter <rostetter at mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
> % ls /usr/bin/python*
> /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/python2 /usr/bin/python2.2
actually /usr/bin/python2 is a symlink to /usr/bin/python
> for me, I changed that line to something like
> #!/usr/bin/python2
Tried that. Nope. Not even changing it to point to /usr/bin/python2.2
works.
I even went as far as poking my nose into /usr/share/yum/ and look at the
header of the *.py files contained in it. didn't work
---- seth vidal <skvidal at phy.duke.edu> wrote:
> what need to update python for mailman? If you updated python outside of
> the packages in the tree - did you, perchance, use rpm --force --nodeps
> to update python?
needed to install the new version of mailman, followed their indications.
And, nope, didn't do a rpm --force --nodeps (looked too radical for my
tastes :-) I did a rpm -Uvh, instead.
> > In the meanwhile, it wouldn't be a bad idea to add a warning about
> > this on the pages related to using/installing yum. :-)
> Would the warning read something like this?:
>
> If you decide to break your install by forcing an incompatible package
> on top of it then things will break.
Nope, was thinking of somethink like "please take care when updating
python by hand after installing yum" (duh!)
I don't know much of python, it is not my favorite scripting language.
Whatever. Mine was just a suggestion geared toward people not python-
proficient (hope that a friend of mine doesn't read this ML :-)
---- "S.Joseph" <joseph at ndimedia.com> wrote:
> Eric is right I installed 2.3 which installed as /usr/bin/python2.3, I
> pointed the /usr/bin/python link to 2.3 and yum failed , I modified yum
> to use 2.2 and it worked again.
well, this is understandable, since it is a bit of a major upgrade. But I
upgraded only from 2.2.2 to 2.2.3! (I thought it was a TINY upgrade :-)
End of the round of quick replies.
I did also a rpmquery -vv --requires on the two .rpms of yum (the older
and the newest) to see if there was some tiny dependency that I missed
(but, hey, the rpm -ivh didn't complain about dependencies and conflicts
with python 2.2.3! and also the rpm -Uvh of python 2.2.3 went fine.)
Since my patience wears off easily, I decided to remove yum (rpm -e yum)
and hunt down all the clutter left behind (like /usr/share/yum and /var/
cache/yum). Even moved my original yum.conf away from /etc/.
BTW, since I think someone asked me where the heck I got those packages,
the yum packages were from dulug.duke.edu (built by seth), while the
python packages was from www.python.org (built by some tummy.com ^-^)
I admit that all this has gotten way off-topic. Hope it all has been
useful in some way to someone else.
I'll go bother the people in yum's mailing list now :-)
--
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| WARNING WARNING WARNING *** EMAIL ADDRESS CHANGED! |
| USE EMAIL ADDRESS PROVIDED BELOW |
| IF YOU KEEP WRITING TO THE OLD ADDRESS IT IS NOT MY FAULT! |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Barbara Pennacchi b.pennacchi at istc.cnr.it |
| Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche |
| Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione |
| V.le Marx 15, 00137 Roma, Italia |
| http://www.istc.cnr.it/ |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list