FC1 legacy for x86_64

[Jesse Keating]

On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 07:57 +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
> As long as nobody needs to QA x86_64 packages, that's OK (i.e., they 
> don't require +VERIFY or +PUBLISH votes).  It takes way too long to 
> get those for i386 versions as it is..

I'm not really comfortable pushing updates w/out QA.  I suppose this is
where the community can chime in.  How many are on x86_64 that need
updates and are willing to QA?  How do you feel about QA on i386 being
enough to push the update on x86_64?

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (http://geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (http://www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key
(http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)

Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20050302/d6bc6048/attachment.sig>