Upcoming transition of FC3

[Jesse Keating]

On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 14:37 -0400, Jeff Sheltren wrote:
> Notice there are separate repo files for base, updates, updates- 
> testing and utils.  I think this goes better with the new yum.repos.d  
> format than having only one repo file.  Also, both base and updates  
> are enabled, testing and utils are not enabled by default.  I think  
> this is a sane and safe default, but I'm open to suggestions.
> 
> When building for FC5, we'll need to disable all repos by default.  I  
> will proceed with that package once we all (or most) agree on this  
> one :)

I never did like all the extra repo files for each repository.  I liked
the idea of one file per family, so there was one file for say
freshrpms, one for atrpms, one for extras, one for core/updates, one for
Legacy.  Each having sub-repos such as testing/devel/whatever.  But
thats just my opinion.  Easier to edit one file than 4.  Fedora steering
folks tell me that I can go w/ what I prefer.  Thoughts?

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (http://geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (http://www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key
(http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)

Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating