Legacy wiki -- statement?

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Sat Dec 9 21:40:30 UTC 2006

On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 03:52:11PM -0600, Eric Rostetter wrote:
> Quoting "David D. Eisenstein" <deisenst at gtw.net>:
> >So what do we need to be saying here?  Ideas?
> I think we're going a bit fast...  Do we really want to wrap up the
> project now, or just put it on hold for a while, or wait until we
> hear back about the 13 month plan?  I'm not sure we have a consences
> yet...
> >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legacy
> I would say we can come up with something that says we're evaluating
> our options, and you shouldn't expect (or depend on) timely updates
> at this time, yada yada yada.  But I'm not sure we should completely
> pull the plug yet (without more consensus like discussions) and I sure
> don't think we should say stuff about the open-core/13-month-extension
> and so on that are not yet decided.
> Or, maybe I just missed the consensus?  Or maybe I missed the principles
> statement they are bailing?

The longer we wait the more it will look like a failure. Better be
active and tell the users that we're working on something than letting
them find out by themselves by being bitten.

We can't and shouldn't announce anything on core/extra's behalf, we
just need to say that the current model is being reorganized and while
doing so distributions X, Y, Z have effectively fallen out of
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20061209/31326657/attachment.sig>

More information about the fedora-legacy-list mailing list