no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]

[Pekka Savola]

On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 12:54 -0600, Eric Rostetter wrote:
>>
>> There has been talk the last couple days of doing away with QA to get it
>> to the updates-testing.  This is what I was referencing, not the current
>> setup.
>
> That is something I will not agree to.  However the timeout period is,
> it strikes a balance.  If we see too many packages get released w/out QA
> by the time the timeout hits, then that is very good indication that we
> can drop that platform.

There has been little or no discussion or proposals regarding doing 
away with QA to get to updates-testing, except for a couple of 
misunderstandings and an idea about "trusted fedora legacy [core] 
members" who could create updates-testing packages on their own (but 
there wasn't much discussion on that).

The current policy change proposal was about reducing the amount of QA 
for moving updates-testing packages to updates.

So, I'm not sure why we're having this conversation..

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings