no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]

[Jesse Keating]

On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 22:34 +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
> 
> The current policy change proposal was about reducing the amount of QA 
> for moving updates-testing packages to updates.
> 
> So, I'm not sure why we're having this conversation.. 

It is just a case of misunderstanding.  Generic terms regarding QA can
muddy the waters between updates-testing QA (phase 2?) and package
source QA (phase 1?).

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20060214/fba3eb6f/attachment.sig>