no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]

[Jesse Keating]

On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 02:20 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Seems to be a misunderstanding here. There are separate repositories
> for 
> testing and general legacy updates. Yes?
> 

He is speaking in virtual terms.  Since we would introduce a timeout, he
is afraid that the quality of packages coming into released will be
lower than it is right now, and be considered "testing" packages.

IMHO the quality of packages hitting updates-testing is pretty on par
with the quality of packages hitting Fedora updates.  So I'm not so sure
what the problem is here.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20060214/69ea1401/attachment.sig>