no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]

[Eric Rostetter]

Quoting Jesse Keating <jkeating at j2solutions.net>:

> On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 15:45 -0600, Eric Rostetter wrote:
>>
>> The problem is two fold:
>>
>> 1) You can't use Fedora standards for the RHL releases, only for the
>> Fedora releases.
>
> You are correct.  However Fedora Legacy originally was just for Fedora.
> It was my choice and the choice of other users to extend the Legacy
> project to the RHL releases.  To be perfectly honest, I'm not all that
> interested in maintaining these RHL releases, but the community seems to
> be for now.

This is not the impression the project gives off in any way other than
its name.

>> 2) This is a major change to the tenents that FL was founded on.  Any such
>> change must be by consensus.  We must establish if there is a consensus or
>> not.
>
> Correct.  We have some of that, although with some misunderstanding on
> many sides (;
>
> Honestly I haven't seen enough naysayers yet to discard this shortened
> timeout policy.

Nor have I seen enough people in favor of it to counter those against it.
In other words, we have very few stating anything at all.

-- 
Eric Rostetter
The Department of Physics
The University of Texas at Austin

Go Longhorns!