no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]

[Mike McCarty]

Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Mike McCarty wrote:
> 
>> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, my indictment earlier was for *all* distributions of Linux.
>>>> But Legacy has gone further than I can follow along, that's all.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We are merely discussing a proposal so legacy process hasnt gone further 
>>
>>
>>
>> That is not my understanding.
>>
>>> at all. You also state that other distributions QA process is better. 
>>
>>
>>
>> Other distros do have better QA, as Red Hat itself says about FCx.
>> RHEL has, per Red Hat, better QA than FC.
> 
> 
> Comparing a commercial product to a community project is unfair. Lets 
> hear about QA processes documented in other community projects.

Eh? My comment, as I asserted again, was about all Linux distros.
None of them has adequate QA. But I know of nobody who has proposed
to move software automatically from a test state to a release state
merely based on time elapsed except for FC and FCL.

[snip]

> See the other mails regarding this.

Certainly did.

Mike
-- 
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!