no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]

[Rahul Sundaram]

Hi

>>>
>>> Other distros do have better QA, as Red Hat itself says about FCx.
>>> RHEL has, per Red Hat, better QA than FC.
>>
>>
>>
>> Comparing a commercial product to a community project is unfair. Lets 
>> hear about QA processes documented in other community projects.
>
>
> Eh? My comment, as I asserted again, was about all Linux distros.
> None of them has adequate QA

This is not a discussion about personal opinions on QA policies within 
all distributions including commercial ones. Only about whether Fedora 
legacy can improve itself to match a better policy within the community 
distributions.

> . But I know of nobody who has proposed
> to move software automatically from a test state to a release state
> merely based on time elapsed except for FC and FCL.

Feel free to point to Fedora legacy a better documented policy within 
the community distributions or better yet contribute towards improving 
it. The time spend in discussions on the list could be directed towards 
actual work.

-- 
Rahul 

Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers