Bugzilla status whiteboard explanation needed

[Pavel Kankovsky]

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Pekka Savola wrote:

> > - rh73 and rh9 is used instead of rhl73 and rhl9
> This may have been typo in the wiki, and these should be rh73 and 
> rh90 (or rh9), at least that's what all current packages use.

171 bugs with rh90
12 bugs with rh9
8 bugs with rhl

"rh73" and "rh90" are our winners

Can anyone privileged enough fix it in the wiki?
(Or grant me the privs to do it? <g>)

> > - impact=xxx is not documented at all
> It has no impact on FL ;-/

There is a handful of FL entries using it, e.g.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181014
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184074
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184098

<shrug>

--Pavel Kankovsky aka Peak  [ Boycott Microsoft--http://www.vcnet.com/bms ]
"Resistance is futile. Open your source code and prepare for assimilation."