Bugzilla status whiteboard explanation needed

[David Eisenstein]

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Pavel Kankovsky wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Pekka Savola wrote:
> 
> > > - rh73 and rh9 is used instead of rhl73 and rhl9
> > This may have been typo in the wiki, and these should be rh73 and 
> > rh90 (or rh9), at least that's what all current packages use.
> <snip>
> 
> "rh73" and "rh90" are our winners
> 
> Can anyone privileged enough fix it in the wiki?
> (Or grant me the privs to do it? <g>)

Fixed.  Oh, and you can grant yourself the privileges to do it.
See <http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/WikiEditing>.

> 
> > > - impact=xxx is not documented at all
> > It has no impact on FL ;-/

I have placed a definition of the impact=xxx tag also in the wiki.
Its use may help inform the reader, worker, developer of the relative 
security importance of the bug.

See <http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legacy/StatusWhiteboard>,
and <http://www.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/>.

-David