FLAME____ Why is the kernel source not included

Martín Marqués martin at bugs.unl.edu.ar
Sat Oct 16 11:47:25 UTC 2004


El Vie 15 Oct 2004 20:36, Ken Johanson escribió:
> Oh goody!!! - I cant wait for the next person to ping in, saying that
> I'm wrong without reading the rationale arguments... not
>
> I'll defend this perpetually if needed, so please follow another
> poster's advise about not responding anymore. Truth is, I am getting
> tired of explaining it *each* and *every* time someones implies that
> having the source is basically trivial (in need for retrieval). Besides
> the thread is the hugest Ive ever started, and is hard for anyone to
> follow - does anyone really to keep gratifying that??? Ha Ha Ha.

Talking about irrational things, why the hell would I need to install qt-devel 
and gtk+-devel to get kernel-source installed in FC2?

I think I already asked this in this list, but each time I read about kernels 
here I keep remembering de *stupid* dependencies that jumped in front of me 
when I tried to install it.

Any comments on that?

-- 
 08:40:02 up 33 days, 22:58,  2 users,  load average: 0.25, 0.34, 0.42
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Martín Marqués        | select 'mmarques' || '@' || 'unl.edu.ar'
Centro de Telematica  |  DBA, Programador, Administrador
             Universidad Nacional
                  del Litoral
-----------------------------------------------------------------




More information about the fedora-list mailing list