[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

RE: FC3 core over RH9, now no BIND :(



I have a virtual server (fresh install) which has been running since Feb
with FC3 and SELinux enabled with no problems whatsoever. In fact, it's so
stable we're rolling it out as a customer platform. Thanks for the input
though

Darryl Jones
System Administrator
SpyProductions
Achieve Web Success
http://spyproductions.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-list-bounces redhat com 
> [mailto:fedora-list-bounces redhat com] On Behalf Of John Summerfied
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 11:30 PM
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> Subject: Re: FC3 core over RH9, now no BIND :(
> 
> 
> Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> > Am Do, den 30.06.2005 schrieb John Summerfied um 4:04:
> > 
> > 
> >>Darryl Jones wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi Guys,
> >>>
> >>>We installed FC3 over RH9 this weekend, and now BIND isn't 
> seeing the 
> >>>zone files in /var/named. I did a chown named:named for all the 
> >>>files, made sure the path was in named.conf....nothing. I replaced 
> >>>named.conf with a backup (pre FC) copy, nothing.
> >>
> >>You should understand that FC is a test-bed. It's probably 
> broken when
> >>it's installed, it seems certain to break at least once 
> before its next 
> >>release. Worse, it has a short life cycle.
> > 
> > 
> >>John
> > 
> > 
> > Sorry John, one hasn't to do with the other. Or you may had the 
> > intention to reply in a different thread. Darryl upgraded 
> from a non 
> > Fedora distribution where no upgrade path is supported in 
> any way and 
> > he is confronted with a change of the default configuration 
> of bind. I 
> > don't see why there is need to comment that with "FC is a test-bed" 
> > and "probably broken".
> 
> It seems from what else he said that his is a pretty important job 
> (primary DNS for various domains). For such a task, I think 
> the choice 
> of FC unwise, it's the sort of thing you want to have running 
> hour after 
> hour, day after day, week after week, month after month....
> 
> Reports and experience here suggest FC is not the best choice 
> for such 
> important work.
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Cheers
> John
> 
> -- spambait
> 1aaaaaaa computerdatasafe com au  
> Z1aaaaaaa computerdatasafe com au Tourist pics 
> http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/
> 
> -- 
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list redhat com
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> 


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]