routing VS nat: can FC3 just be a router between eth0 <-> ppp0 with no MASQ/NAT???
Gilboa Davara
gilboad at gmail.com
Sun Mar 12 06:34:13 UTC 2006
On Sat, 2006-03-11 at 16:21 -0500, James Pifer wrote:
> > >
> > > I tried clearing the masquerade table, then clients can't reach the
> > > remote network. So the FC3 machine, with a connection to eth0 and ppp0,
> > > plus set to act as a router, does not appear to act as a router between
> > > eth0 and ppp0.
> > >
> > > Is it possible to make it be a router between eth0 and ppp0 without
> > > masquerade? Just be a router....
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > James
> > >
> >
> > Forgive my stupid question, but does each of your machines inside your
> > LAN has a true IP address?
> >
> > Gilboa
> >
>
> If you mean unique address, yes. If you mean internet routable, no, but
> the other side of the vpn is not internet routable either. One side is
> 192.168.1.0 and the other is 10.0.0.0. I'm looking at this more like a
> branch office VPN. The routers on the remote side have static routes to
> know where to find my network.
>
> Hope that made sense.
>
> James
>
I've built a similar setup @home (and @work) using vtund.
http://dag.wieers.com/packages/vtun/?M=D
(Rebuilt the SRPM to FC4)
Each of the firewalls machines run vtund, giving me secure vpn
connection between the two networks.
Gilboa
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list