Suggestions for e-mail client:

[Les Mikesell]

On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 10:13 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> >
> > Yet we all have to endure your although very secure 19 line text
> > siganture...
> >
> >   ;-)
> 
> Do you mean the gpg signature?  If so, yes.  Unlike html this is a security 
> feature not a liability.

How much of a feature is having your mail program do some extra
work to report this - on the message I'm replying to:

The signature of this message cannot be verified, it
may have been altered in transit.

gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
gpg: Signature made Fri 29 Sep 2006 04:13:56 AM CDT using DSA key ID
BFE7357F
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found

It doesn't give me any warm fuzzies...

-- 
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell at gmail.com