selinux eradicator?

[Mike McCarty]

Tom Horsley wrote:
> 
> Or maybe a selinux free fedora spin?
> 
[snippage]

Why not? I don't want it on my machine, either. I suspect quite
a few people would prefer not to have it. It could be made
an optional part of the install. Putting selinux as a requirement
into the individual packages is silly. If RPM is incapable of
recognizing some sort of package dependency like "I play with
these versions, but do not require any of them", then RPM needs
an enhancemet.

Mike
-- 
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!